guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-clark-county-et-al
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-clark-county-et-al channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:35 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
civil
Case Number
CV-378-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2025-09-27 08:16 p.m.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-09 09:35 p.m.
FOR SINGHSKI, J
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:38 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Hon’ble Judge Singhski.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-08-09 09:39 p.m.
@singhski
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:41 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @ian to the case channel.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:41 p.m.
@ian County Attorney, file NOA
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:42 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @james to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:42 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @bob78711new to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:42 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-09 09:42 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @dero to the case channel.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:43 p.m.
Good evening. Good evening. Good evening.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:44 p.m.
I would like a temporary restraining order (colloquially known as a TRO), either with or without briefing if you prefer that. Please let me know!
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:44 p.m.
I would like any responsive pleading to be filed ASAP, preferably within the next few hours @ian . I understand this is an important issue which will reach the Supreme Court.
meowiittenmeowiitten
I would like a temporary restraining order (colloquially known as a TRO), either with or without briefing if you prefer that. Please let me know!
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:44 p.m.
Perhaps you could file it on paper and we can have a hearing(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
Vc hearing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
Actually since there is two judicial decisions already confirming what we know
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
That it is defunct
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
The proper course of action might be summary judgment briefed on a PI schedule
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
So expedited summary judgment
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:45 p.m.
See Wilcox v. Trump
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
There is only a single question of law to decide
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
I see
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
And then the defendants can do a cross-motion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
for summary judgment
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
And then you can rule
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
I do still want a hearing tomorrow
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:46 p.m.
@ian @meowiitten
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:47 p.m.
Or whenever you both have it on paper
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:48 p.m.
@singhski where is the complaint and motion
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:48 p.m.
. @ian
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:49 p.m.
Motion hasn’t been filed yet but the State has indicated they will be doing so shortly.
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:50 p.m.
R
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:51 p.m.
@singhski perhaps I'm just confused, because
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:51 p.m.
The attorney general has already filed a quo warranto action
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:51 p.m.
That only removes them from the board
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:51 p.m.
Is this not identical to that?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:51 p.m.
No
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
This declares and enjoins them from enforcing the charter
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
Additionally your honor we are also already preliminarily enjoined
meowiittenmeowiitten
That only removes them from the board
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
^
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
And restores the status quo which is the State Senate and Governor control the county
ianian
Additionally your honor we are also already preliminarily enjoined
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
Are you talking about the decision rendered by Ret. Judge Gobies?
meowiittenmeowiitten
This declares and enjoins them from enforcing the charter
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
Why is that needed if there isn't anyone to enforce it in the first place
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
or has there been a recent decision
singhskisinghski
Are you talking about the decision rendered by Ret. Judge Gobies?
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
No, The Hon'ble Rummy
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
Just like
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:52 p.m.
3 hours ago or so
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
Because the underlying charter constituting their actions is still "in force"
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
And they still rely on it
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
state-of-mayflower-danielcrusoe-et-al
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
Actually for that matter, there's no barrier to proceeding to summary judgment since this is a related case
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
If you claim so
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
Speak clearly are you saying this is a decided controversy
meowiittenmeowiitten
Actually for that matter, there's no barrier to proceeding to summary judgment since this is a related case
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
That was just preliminary, no facts were concluded on
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
@ian
singhskisinghski
Speak clearly are you saying this is a decided controversy
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
No
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:53 p.m.
I am saying this is a duplicate, frivolous action
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:54 p.m.
ok stop talking for a second
ianian
Click to see attachment.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:55 p.m.
no this is different @ian
singhskisinghski
no this is different @ian
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:56 p.m.
To me it's kind of the same
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
Frivolous was kind of mean
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
I spent a lot of time on the complaint
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
:/
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
:/
meowiittenmeowiitten
Frivolous was kind of mean
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
I'm sorry I should've used the word unnecessary instead
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
That would attack the purpose of your complaint but not its contents or merit
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:57 p.m.
I wouldn't say it's duplicate since for that matter Singhski would be inclined to also grant some kind of PI in this case
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
From your perspective I would say it is not duplicate
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Your end goal is to stop the enforcement of a county charter that is law
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Coming from people that are already enjoined from doing so
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Seems odd to me is all
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Filing related cases isn't actually not allowed
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
I know but I dont think there is a controversy here
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Certainly no irreparable harm
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:58 p.m.
Uhhh
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
clearly you're acting under that parent of the people doctrine right
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Weird latin name
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Padris or soemthing
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Who are the quo warranto respondents
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
list their names
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Ok
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Just the county commissioners
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Ashleypueri robertrosenthal
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
County of clark
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
Arvantise
ian
ian 2025-08-09 09:59 p.m.
1 more
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
Accurateswalker
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
So this one seeks to enjoin more people, correct? @meowiitten
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
Yeah and enjoin the charter entirely and restore the status quo, which is that the Senate and Governor control the cunty
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
county
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
because you write “Defendants” plural, collectively referring to them all
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
Yes I mean that's intentional
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
@ian It is different in that regard
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:00 p.m.
Does that make sense?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
well everything else is different that was your point of confusion
singhskisinghski
@ian It is different in that regard
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
It would make more sense frankly to amend the quo warranto
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
If this case is identical as you say then that would support my argument for a PI since a judge would want consistency in rulings even if it's from the same court
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
Is what I was gonna say
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
Well no
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
wdym no
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
The injunction was granted procedurally as part of it being a quo warranto action
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
This isn't a quo warranto
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
There is a standard here for a PI/TRO
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
He didn't have to grant the injunction
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
It's not automatic
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
the point of injunctions is to maintain the status quo..?
meowiittenmeowiitten
It's not automatic
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:01 p.m.
It is
singhskisinghski
the point of injunctions is to maintain the status quo..?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:02 p.m.
@ian
singhskisinghski
the point of injunctions is to maintain the status quo..?
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:02 p.m.
Yes but irreparable harm is needed in a civil action whereas it is not in quo warranto
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:02 p.m.
It's automatic
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:02 p.m.
Are you saying we can't be harmed
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:02 p.m.
I'm a little confused
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:03 p.m.
Counsellor you aren’t speaking clearly and I feel as though you are making up your arguments on the spot @ian
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:03 p.m.
Do you want to come back in a few hours?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:03 p.m.
We don't need to bring this under the parens patriae doctrine because this is brought under the constitution
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:03 p.m.
"The Governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws. He may, by appropriate court action or proceeding brought in the name of the State, enforce compliance with any constitutional or legislative mandate, or restrain violation of any constitutional or legislative power, duty, or right by any officer, department, or agency of the State or any of its political subdivisions."
singhskisinghski
Counsellor you aren’t speaking clearly and I feel as though you are making up your arguments on the spot @ian
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:03 p.m.
I'm trying to defend this spontaneously yes because I have to go to sleep and don't have time to write anything or review thoroughly
meowiittenmeowiitten
"The Governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws. He may, by appropriate court action or proceeding brought in the name of the State, enforce compliance wi...
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
If the motion for TRO is as urgent as it is purported to be
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
Then I wont have time to defend
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
No we're moving for summary judgment now
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
When I wake up it will be granted
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
I was placing it in the respect of a PI
meowiittenmeowiitten
No we're moving for summary judgment now
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
Moving for SJ after only a complaint
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:04 p.m.
ok
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:05 p.m.
Yeah it's possible
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:05 p.m.
It happens a lot in cases that only involve questions of law only(edited)
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:06 p.m.
You're saying a case can get to the point of summary judgment wholly unilaterally
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:06 p.m.
I haven't even filed a NOA it's late
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:07 p.m.
ok so basically
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:07 p.m.
In Wilcox the U.S DC Judge Howell was convinced that expedited summary judgment was warranted
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:07 p.m.
because of circumstances similar to this
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:08 p.m.
but before that @meowiitten I must ask you to file a motion for expedited summary judgment
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:09 p.m.
Yeah working on it
singhskisinghski
because of circumstances similar to this
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:09 p.m.
There, I believe there was only one issue right? @meowiitten in relation to the NLRA(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:10 p.m.
whether the President could remove NLRB members the way he did
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
The standard for expedited summary judgment is (1) regular summary judgment standard, and (2) meeting the standard for an injunction (PI/TRO)
✅1
singhskisinghski
There, I believe there was only one issue right? @meowiitten in relation to the NLRA(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
Yeah
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
Same here
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
Good. Good good good
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
Whether or not the county government is defunct basically
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
And if so then
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-09 10:11 p.m.
Basically State Senate and Governor controls and yeah
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:14 p.m.
I am very sleepy
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:14 p.m.
@ian will need you to vc tmrw
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:14 p.m.
or whenever you file your response
singhski
singhski 2025-08-09 10:14 p.m.
You can type but I think you’d be at a severe disadvantage.
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:15 p.m.
Lil guy is eepy like me
singhskisinghski
@ian will need you to vc tmrw
ian
ian 2025-08-09 10:15 p.m.
I cant ill type
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:19 a.m.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SUMMARY JUDGMENT
@singhski @ian
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:22 a.m.
PLAINITFF'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SUMMARY JUDGMENT
@singhski @ian
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 01:18 p.m.
@ian Reply?
singhskisinghski
@ian Reply?
ian
ian 2025-08-10 01:21 p.m.
would you like me to provide an answer, or a reply to the motion
ianian
would you like me to provide an answer, or a reply to the motion
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 01:21 p.m.
Answer first preferably
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 01:22 p.m.
answer necessary because I need to see if there is a legitimate factual dispute
ian
ian 2025-08-10 01:22 p.m.
I'm asking because ordinarily we'd have 7 days for an answer
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 01:22 p.m.
I would like for this to be resolved as quickly as humanly possible
ian
ian 2025-08-10 01:22 p.m.
I'll do my best your honor
singhskisinghski
answer necessary because I need to see if there is a legitimate factual dispute
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:27 p.m.
There wasn’t an answer in the Wilcox case but maybe that was by choice
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:27 p.m.
It was just complaint -> motion for summary judgment -> cross-motion for summary judgment -> decision
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:31 p.m.
Basically the idea here is like:
-> both parties agree that the “emergency session” took place, and all of these appointments happened (the only fact) -> was it legal? (question of law)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:31 p.m.
Actually
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:31 p.m.
Let me check if our rules have anything which don’t require answers when another dispositive motion is pending
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:32 p.m.
I can point to other cases in this district court that allowed what I have done here a lot of them were under Cabot
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:32 p.m.
Well in Wilcox they also expeditiously filed any evidence so that an evidentiary record could be built @meowiitten
singhskisinghski
Well in Wilcox they also expeditiously filed any evidence so that an evidentiary record could be built @meowiitten
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:33 p.m.
There’s not really any exhibits to file other than the letter
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:33 p.m.
I can do that actually
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:33 p.m.
That way the no genuine dispute as to factual matter standard could be met
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:33 p.m.
It’s the one exhibit that matters
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:33 p.m.
My point being don’t tell me what you admit or deny @ian
meowiittenmeowiitten
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED SUMMARY JUDGMENT @singhski @ian
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:34 p.m.
Office of the District Attorney Mersea, M.F. 20530 August 8, 2025 RELEASE FOR RECORD FROM: CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF & DISTRICT ATTORNEY SUBJECT: JOINT STATEMENT FROM THE SHERIFF AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY REGARDING THE APPEARANCE OF A COUNTY BOARD WITHIN THE SPAN OF AN HOUR Dear Citizens of Clark, ...
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:34 p.m.
Just show me the actual evidence you have. If your evidence conflicts, there will be a factual dispute. If not, I can decide now
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:34 p.m.
There that's the only exhibit I have to give
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 02:34 p.m.
It's also cited in the motion and complaint
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:35 p.m.
And anyways mere denials aren’t always necessary(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:35 p.m.
the substance of the cause stands or falls on the evidence adduced so please attach that @ian
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 02:35 p.m.
Along with any opposition to the motion and cross motion
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 04:01 p.m.
@singhski Did you want a hearing or
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:15 p.m.
@ian @meowiitten How about in two hours?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 05:16 p.m.
Alright if it's VC/stage
✅1
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:16 p.m.
@ian Do you have a cross motion + opp. for me yet or nahy
ian
ian 2025-08-10 05:17 p.m.
@walter! I believe the district attorney will be filing an appearance
ian
ian 2025-08-10 05:17 p.m.
in my place
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:18 p.m.
@bob78711new
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 05:32 p.m.
@singhski this is being litigated in state-of-mayflower-danielcrusoe-et-al
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 05:32 p.m.
there is a hearing this afternoon which should settle this
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 05:32 p.m.
if there is anything remaining unanswered then plaintiff can amend his complaint
bob78711newbob78711new
there is a hearing this afternoon which should settle this
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 05:41 p.m.
A related case doesn't settle this that's not how it works
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 05:42 p.m.
we will move to dismiss depending on the ruling
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 05:44 p.m.
Buddy that's not how that works(edited)
bob78711newbob78711new
@singhski this is being litigated in state-of-mayflower-danielcrusoe-et-al
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:47 p.m.
no it really isn't(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:48 p.m.
I'm not sure why this misconception is still alive when I debunked it not too long ago
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:48 p.m.
the others are in relation to the County Commission
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 05:48 p.m.
this is challenging the authority of EVERY defendant named in the complaint
singhskisinghski
no it really isn't(edited)
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 05:51 p.m.
Daniel crusoe is not even on the board so that needs to be amended
singhskisinghski
@ian @meowiitten How about in two hours?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:49 p.m.
7:30 PM EST?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:49 p.m.
or 45
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:50 p.m.
I'm good at 45 but 30 is cutting it close
meowiittenmeowiitten
I'm good at 45 but 30 is cutting it close
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 06:52 p.m.
@bob78711new 7:30 good for you?
singhskisinghski
@bob78711new 7:30 good for you?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:54 p.m.
Lets do 45
singhskisinghski
@bob78711new 7:30 good for you?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 06:56 p.m.
no
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 06:56 p.m.
I have court at 8:30
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 06:56 p.m.
Can we do this tomorrow?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:57 p.m.
I mean the cases are happening back to back why can't you
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 06:57 p.m.
This is also court
bob78711newbob78711new
Can we do this tomorrow?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 06:59 p.m.
You don't have that much time to respond to the MSJ
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 06:59 p.m.
per our scheduling rules you were given 48 hours
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 06:59 p.m.
so I'm certain almost that this is probably the fairest shot you have to present your case
singhskisinghski
You don't have that much time to respond to the MSJ
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:01 p.m.
Cant we do it first thing tomorrow?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:01 p.m.
or like an hour
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:01 p.m.
after court today
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:01 p.m.
and plantiff still needs to amend his complaint
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:03 p.m.
your honor the plantiff is also asking for almost the same exact relief as well
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:03 p.m.
would it not be better to allow the other case which was filed first to play out?
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:03 p.m.
thats the hearing I have at 8:30
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:04 p.m.
Bush v. Gore was argued and decided in 2 days
meowiittenmeowiitten
Bush v. Gore was argued and decided in 2 days
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:07 p.m.
that was on the eve of an election
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:07 p.m.
there is already a TRO in place
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:07 p.m.
there is no rush to do anything because of the TRO
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:07 p.m.
especialy on such a delicate matter
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:07 p.m.
I don't know what you don't understand, that TRO was against different defendants
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:08 p.m.
and we decided this hearing would be conducted today
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:08 p.m.
I intend on sticking to the court's schedule
singhskisinghski
I don't know what you don't understand, that TRO was against different defendants
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:08 p.m.
you cant enjoin the Sheriff and DA from doing their dutys that are still active
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:08 p.m.
daniel crusoe does not serve on the county board
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:08 p.m.
so he has no power
bob78711newbob78711new
daniel crusoe does not serve on the county board
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:09 p.m.
@meowiitten Was this true when you filed your complaint
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:09 p.m.
also, if that is the case we will dismiss the action against him
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:09 p.m.
and arvantise is already enjoined
singhskisinghski
@meowiitten Was this true when you filed your complaint
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:09 p.m.
he resigned from CB and CE within 2 minutes
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:09 p.m.
so like
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:10 p.m.
what are we doing here chat
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
@singhski its even stated in his evidence
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
raise at the hearing
singhskisinghski
@meowiitten Was this true when you filed your complaint
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
Im going off of the letter
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
like these are issues for the hearing
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
like these are issues for the hearing
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:12 p.m.
It says he was appointed, made president, then made executive (?), then resigned
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
Also why does this matter yet
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
Yes thank you
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
These are issues for the hearing. Please raise them there.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
like this is just a duplicate proceeding
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
If you can, we could join the game right now, I do not mind.
singhskisinghski
If you can, we could join the game right now, I do not mind.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:13 p.m.
as long as we are done before 8:30
bob78711newbob78711new
as long as we are done before 8:30
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:14 p.m.
We will surely be done by then
singhskisinghski
We will surely be done by then
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:14 p.m.
alright
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:14 p.m.
VC?
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:14 p.m.
Waiting to see if Sado is ready
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:14 p.m.
yes, vc
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:16 p.m.
@meowiitten
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:22 p.m.
Yes I’m ready
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:23 p.m.
@singhski I can’t join the game though
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:23 p.m.
discord works for me too
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:24 p.m.
We will start soon
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:24 p.m.
setting everything up
singhskisinghski
setting everything up
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:28 p.m.
your honor there is now a little over an hour before the next hearing
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:29 p.m.
Relax
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:29 p.m.
this might be more important anyways(edited)
singhski
singhski 2025-08-10 07:29 p.m.
it could be joever for you
singhskisinghski
this might be more important anyways(edited)
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:32 p.m.
its adressing the same thing
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:32 p.m.
its almost identical to the other one except it names daniel
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:32 p.m.
just as the other one did
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:33 p.m.
but the other one was amended
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 07:36 p.m.
@singhski Stage is set up
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-10 07:37 p.m.
@singhski need to be brought up
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 08:10 p.m.
@bob78711new @singhski
singhskisinghski used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-08-10 08:16 p.m.
Case Modified
@singhski has added @Deverus to the case channel.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-08-10 08:18 p.m.
some fucking pop-up kicked me out of the stage @singhski
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 09:10 p.m.
@singhski When can we get a ruling Sir
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-10 09:10 p.m.
Please
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski When can we get a ruling Sir
singhski
singhski 2025-08-11 08:14 a.m.
Within the next 5 hours
singhskisinghski
Within the next 5 hours
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 01:29 p.m.
Alright
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 01:30 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 01:30 p.m.
@singhski Second notice of supplemental authority
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 04:14 p.m.
@singhski I’m mad as fuck
meowiittenmeowiitten
@singhski I’m mad as fuck
ian
ian 2025-08-11 04:37 p.m.
me too
ian
ian 2025-08-11 04:37 p.m.
rahhhh :😡::😡::😡::🤬::🤬::🤬::🤬:
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-11 04:40 p.m.
singhski
singhski 2025-08-11 04:40 p.m.
Cc: @ian @bob78711new @meowiitten
singhskisinghski
Click to see attachment.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-11 04:45 p.m.
the charter was never declared defunct in the other case?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 04:48 p.m.
Pipe down please
bob78711newbob78711new
the charter was never declared defunct in the other case?
AlbertBlackwell
AlbertBlackwell 2025-08-11 04:48 p.m.
AlbertBlackwellAlbertBlackwell
Click to see attachment.
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-11 04:48 p.m.
not the amendment
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-11 04:49 p.m.
the judge is saying the entire charter
bob78711new
bob78711new 2025-08-11 04:49 p.m.
is void
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-08-11 04:49 p.m.
Defunct not void
singhski
singhski 2025-08-11 04:53 p.m.
Grok summarize
singhskisinghski
Grok summarize
ian
ian 2025-08-11 07:31 p.m.
ianian
Click to see attachment.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-08-12 05:29 p.m.
:😭:
krmkrm used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 10:15 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 10:15 a.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XI.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-12 10:15 a.m.
Exported 301 messages